Common discrepancies in documents
Bill of exchange (Draft)
- Drawn incorrectly (i.e. to wrong party)
- The amount drawn exceeds the credit amount
- Capacity of signers not designated. (i.e. not an
authorized signatory in the bank's record)
- Tenor not in conformity with Letter of Credit
- Not marked the wording something like "drawn under
Bank XXX Letter of Credit Number XXX..." as required by the credit
Invoices
- Value exceeds credit amount
- Amount differs from draft amount
- Prices of goods not as shown in the Letter of
Credit
- Description of goods differs from credit terms
- Omission of the price basis and shipment terms
(FOB, CIF, C&F etc)
- Inclusion of charges not specified in credit
- Not certified, notarized or signed as required by
credit
- Party to be invoiced differs from that mentioned
or required in credit
- Invoice not issued by beneficiary
- The inclusion of debit/credit note which is not
specifically allowed
Bills of Lading
- Not presented in full sets when requested.
- Alterations not authenticated by an official of
the shipping company or their agents
- Are not "clean" bills (i.e. carrying
remarks that the condition and packing of the goods is defective)
- Are not marked "on board" when so
required.
- "On board" endorsements not signed or
initialed by the carrier or agents. "On board" endorsements not dated.
- Not blank endorsed if drawn to order.
- Do not indicate "freight prepaid" as
stipulated in credit (under C&F or CIF contracts)
- Are not marked "freight prepaid" when
freight charges are included in invoice
- Are made out to order when the letter of credit
stipulated "direct to consignee" or vice versa.
- Are dated later than the latest shipment date
specified in the credit
- Not presented within 21 days after date of
shipment or such lesser time as specified in the credit.
- Include goods other that specified
- Rate of which freight is calculated, and total
amount, not shown when credit required these details.
- Shipment has been effected "on deck".
Bill of Lading claused "on deck" are not acceptable when "clean on board
" bills are required.
- Shipment made from a port or to a destination
other than that stipulated
- Other types of bills of lading presented which are
not specifically authorized. e.g. Charter Party B/L.
Airway Bill
- Air waybill not countersigned by shipped
- House air waybill submitted which is not
specifically accepted in the credit
Insurance
- The amount of cover is insufficient or does not include
"risks" mentioned in the credit.
- Not issued in the currency of the credit
- Not endorsed and/or signed
- Certificate or policy bear a date later than date of
shipment/despatch
- Goods are not correctly described
- Alterations are not correctly described
- Not in transferable form when required
- Carrying steamer's name not recorded
- Does not cover transhipment when bills of lading indicate
it will take place
- When a policy is called for under a credit, a certificate
or a broker's cover note is presented. (N.B. However a policy is acceptable when a
certificate is called for. A broker's cover note is not acceptable unless specifically
permitted in the credit.
Others
- The letter of credit has expired
- Not all documents required by the letter of credit are
presented
- Documents are not presented within 21 days of the date of
despatch/shipment or such lesser date as specified in the credit
- Descriptions, marks and numbers of packages are not
consistent in all documents or are not required by the credit
- Routing displayed are not consistent in all documents.
- Third party document presented. (For point 5 & 6, this is a common problem for exporters in HK
when A China GSP Form A is required in the credit and shipment is from China via HK to
overseas destination. The GSP Form A can only be applied by the factory in China. So only
a third party GSP Form A can be submitted. To resolve the problem, suggest exporter in HK
to request buyer to add a clause in L/C stating that "third party GSP Form A showing
routing and invoice number differing from other documents acceptable".)